Reference
Compare peptides
Two to four compounds, field by field: identity, United States regulatory status, and what kinds of documents are on file. The table records differences. It does not rank them.
No winner, no score, no recommendation. Counts describe how many documents of each kind Therapept has indexed — not how well a compound works, and not how much has been published overall.
Link to this comparison: /compare?peptides=gt20029,retatrutide,cagrilintide
| GT20029 | Retatrutide | Cagrilintide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Class | Investigational topical androgen-receptor degrader (PROTAC), developed by Kintor Pharmaceutical | Investigational triple agonist of GIP, GLP-1 and glucagon receptors | Investigational long-acting acylated amylin analogue |
| Also listed as | GT-20029, Kintor AR degrader | LY3437943, LY-3437943 | Not recorded |
| Molecular formula | Not recorded | Not recorded | C194H312N54O59S2 |
| Molecular weight | Not recorded | 4731.33 g/mol (average mass, widely cited for the free base) | 4409 g/mol |
| CAS | Not recorded | 2381089-83-2 | 1415456-99-3 |
| PubChem CID | Not recorded | Not recorded | 171397054 |
| Sequence length | Not recorded | Not recorded | Described structurally, not as a residue list |
| Data caveat | None recorded | PubChem’s retatrutide record states a CID is not available as a discrete structure. Full caveat | None recorded |
| United States regulatory status | |||
| Status | Investigational | Investigational | Investigational |
| FDA application | None recorded | None recorded | None recorded |
| Compounding | No FDA compounding entry recorded | No FDA compounding entry recorded | No FDA compounding entry recorded |
| WADA | Not named in this record | Not named in this record | Not named in this record |
| Research profile | |||
| Research purpose | Topical androgen-receptor degradation | Triple-agonist metabolic research | No plain-English profile recorded |
| Proposed mechanism | A topical PROTAC-type molecule intended to mark androgen receptors for degradation, reducing androgen signalling in the follicle. The published Phase 2 trial tests the clinical consequence of that mechanism. | Proposed triple agonism: GLP-1 and GIP effects on appetite and insulin, plus glucagon-receptor signalling in the liver and energy expenditure. The net clinical contribution of each arm is still being studied. | No plain-English profile recorded |
| Human evidence | A randomised, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial in 180 Chinese men with androgenetic alopecia was published in 2025. No Phase 3 trial or approval exists. | A published 48-week Phase 2 trial in 338 adults, plus Phase 3 trials registered and sponsor topline disclosures. No approved product exists. | No plain-English profile recorded |
| Evidence tier | Phase 2 trials registered or reported | Phase 3 trials registered or reported | No plain-English profile recorded |
| Known safety concerns |
|
| No plain-English profile recorded |
| Evidence gaps |
|
| No plain-English profile recorded |
| Head-to-head evidence | No published head-to-head trial against finasteride, minoxidil or any other hair-loss treatment. | No published head-to-head trial against semaglutide or tirzepatide. Cross-trial comparisons are not head-to-head evidence. | No plain-English profile recorded |
| Named pathways | Androgen receptor · Ubiquitin-proteasome degradation · DHT signalling | GIP receptor · GLP-1 receptor · Glucagon receptor · Hepatic lipid oxidation · Energy expenditure | No plain-English profile recorded |
| Evidence on file | |||
| Records | |||
| Human-interventional records | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Human-observational records | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Animal records | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| In-vitro records | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Reviews | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Regulatory documents | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Earliest indexed | 2025 | 2023 | Not recorded |
| Latest indexed | 2025 | 2026 | Not recorded |
Every identity and regulatory value above is taken from the compound’s record, where its sources are listed. Evidence counts are derived from the published evidence file at build time. A missing class means no document of that kind is indexed — not that none exists.
