Reference
Compare peptides
Two to four compounds, field by field: identity, United States regulatory status, and what kinds of documents are on file. The table records differences. It does not rank them.
No winner, no score, no recommendation. Counts describe how many documents of each kind Therapept has indexed — not how well a compound works, and not how much has been published overall.
Link to this comparison: /compare?peptides=ghk-cu,ahk-cu
| GHK-Cu | AHK-Cu | |
|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||
| Class | Copper(II) complex of the tripeptide glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine. Cosmetic ingredient under the INCI name Copper Tripeptide-1 | Copper(II) complex of the tripeptide L-alanyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine; a structural analogue of GHK-Cu in which glycine is replaced by alanine |
| Also listed as | Copper tripeptide-1, Prezatide copper, Copper peptide | Copper tripeptide-3, Ala-His-Lys copper, AHK copper complex |
| Molecular formula | C14H23CuN6O4+ (prezatide copper, PubChem CID 71587328) | Not recorded |
| Molecular weight | 402.92 g/mol (as prezatide copper) | Not recorded |
| CAS | 89030-95-5 (copper complex) · 49557-75-7 (uncomplexed GHK) | Not recorded |
| PubChem CID | 71587328 | Not recorded |
| Sequence length | Described structurally, not as a residue list | Described structurally, not as a residue list |
| Data caveat | PubChem holds three non-equivalent records and no neutral 1:1 complex: prezatide copper (CID 71587328, cationic), copper tripeptide (CID 139035031, anionic), and bisprezatide copper (CID 9831891, a 2:1 complex). Full caveat | AHK-Cu is not GHK-Cu. Full caveat |
| United States regulatory status | ||
| Status | No FDA-approved product | No FDA-approved product |
| FDA application | None recorded | None recorded |
| Compounding | FDA nomination withdrawn; the published entry is scoped to injectable routes. | No FDA compounding entry recorded |
| WADA | Not named in this record | Not named in this record |
| Research profile | ||
| Research purpose | Copper-peptide skin and follicle biology | Copper-peptide follicle biology |
| Proposed mechanism | Proposed to deliver copper to skin cells and modulate collagen, elastin and matrix-metalloproteinase activity. Much of the mechanistic work is in vitro or in animal models. | Proposed copper-dependent effects on dermal papilla cells and follicle growth. The published evidence is ex vivo human follicle culture and cell culture, not a human trial. |
| Human evidence | Topical cosmetic studies exist, but they are small and formulation-specific. Therapept indexes no approved drug product and no large clinical trial for hair growth. | One directly relevant published study: human hair follicles ex vivo and cultured dermal papilla cells. No human clinical trial is indexed. |
| Evidence tier | Preclinical models; no human efficacy trial indexed | No human data indexed |
| Known safety concerns |
|
|
| Evidence gaps |
|
|
| Head-to-head evidence | No published controlled comparison of GHK-Cu against AHK-Cu, minoxidil or finasteride for hair outcomes. | No controlled comparison with GHK-Cu, minoxidil or any other hair treatment has been published. |
| Named pathways | Copper transport · Collagen synthesis · Matrix metalloproteinases · Dermal papilla biology | Copper transport · Dermal papilla proliferation · Apoptosis signalling |
| Evidence on file | ||
| Records | ||
| Human-interventional records | 0 | 0 |
| Human-observational records | 0 | 0 |
| Animal records | 0 | 0 |
| In-vitro records | 0 | 1 |
| Reviews | 3 | 0 |
| Regulatory documents | 1 | 0 |
| Earliest indexed | 2008 | 2007 |
| Latest indexed | 2026 | 2007 |
Every identity and regulatory value above is taken from the compound’s record, where its sources are listed. Evidence counts are derived from the published evidence file at build time. A missing class means no document of that kind is indexed — not that none exists.
Overlapping pathways
Named in the mechanism discussion for at least two of these compounds: Copper transport.
Shared biology is not shared evidence. No claim of synergy is made here, and overlapping pathways do not mean the compounds have been studied together.
